.
PMS for therapists - 2025
Dear Sir or Madam, please take a few minutes of your time to complete the following questionnaire.
Start
Secured
Survio
Post Market Surveillance for therapists
1
Please enter your whole name
2
Please type your email address
3
Please choose the type of device you own
Choose all that are relevant
Q9
SCIO
4
Your type of Education
Select one or more answers
Medicine
Naturopathy
Other
5
Total number of active clients
Select one answer
0
1-9
10-19
20-29
30-49
50-100
100+
6
How long have you been using our products?
Select one answer
This is the initial time.
Less than a month
1 year to 3 years
3 year to 5 years
6 years or more
7
How satisfied are you with the device?
Select one answer
5 - Very satisfied
4 - Satisfied
3 - Neutral
2 - Dissatisfied
1 - Very dissatisfied
8
If you answered dissatisfied with the device in the previous question, please explain
9
How satisfied are you with the software?
Select one answer
5 - Very satisfied
4 - Satisfied
3 - Neutral
2- Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied
1 - Very dissatisfied
10
If you answered dissatisfied with software in the previous question, please explain
Not mandatory question
11
How satisfied are you with the Clasp Portal?
Select one answer
5 - Very satisfied
4 - Satisfied
3 - Neutral
2- Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied
1 - Very dissatisfied
12
If you answered dissatisfied with Clasp Portal in the previous question, please explain
Not mandatory question
13
Age range of clients
Select one or more answers Please note that the clinical trials were limited to individuals aged 18-65. The effects on other age groups are unknown.
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-65
14
% of clients who only did one session?
Select one answer
0-9%
10-29%
30-59%
60-79%
80-100%
15
% of clients who are returning?
Select one answer
0-9%
10-29%
30-59%
60-79%
80-100%
16
Activity level characteristics of the clients from whom the device is effective?
Select one or more answers
Sedentary
Moderately Active
Very Active
17
What are you using your device for on your clients?
Select one or more answers Please note that our clinical studies have only evaluated the effectiveness of this device for wound, pain reduction, stress, and muscle rehabilitation.
Stress detection and reduction
Muscle rehabilitation/re-education
Wound healing
Pain reduction
18
Thinking about the times you used the device, what percentage of those sessions would you say were effective in helping with stress detection and/or reduction?
Select one answer
67-100% (High Effectiveness)
34-66% (Medium Effectiveness)
1-33% (Low Effectiveness)
0%
I did not use the device for stress detection and reduction
19
Considering the times you used the device, what proportion of those sessions do you feel were beneficial for muscle rehabilitation?
Select one answer
67-100% (High Effectiveness)
34-66% (Medium Effectiveness)
1-33% (Low Effectiveness)
0%
I did not use the device for stress detection and reduction
20
Thinking about the times you used the device, what percentage of those sessions do you believe were helpful for wound healing?
Select one answer
67-100% (High Effectiveness)
34-66% (Medium Effectiveness)
1-33% (Low Effectiveness)
0%
I did not use the device for stress detection and reduction
21
Thinking about the times you used the device, what percentage of those sessions do you believe were helpful for pain reduction?
Select one answer
I did not use the device for stress detection and reduction
0%
1-33% (Low Effectiveness)
34-66% (Medium Effectiveness)
67-100% (High Effectiveness)
Submit